SPRICO
AI red teaming and guardrail efficacy testing. 2,350 adversarial prompts anchored to an 85 control enterprise checklist, run across five variants so the report shows not only whether a system breaks but how much its guardrails are worth, with every finding filed as governance evidence.
What it does
- A corpus of more than 2,350 rows on a 32 column schema, anchored to the enterprise AI security checklist of 85 controls, with all 37 red team testable controls covered.
- Five variant matrix on every test: canonical, guardrailed baseline, unguardrailed baseline, adversarial guardrailed, adversarial unguardrailed. The deltas are the guardrail efficacy.
- Scoring across twelve model types with an LLM judge for semantic controls; sector driven conversational objectives; adapters for Anthropic, OpenAI compatible and generic HTTP endpoints.
- Every finding carries EU AI Act article references, CERT-In AI advisory posture and AIVSS estimates, and is written as a per finding evidence artefact.
- Multi run history, dashboards per category and per model type, guardrail efficacy views by sector, an authentication gate with roles.
- Cross walk to AISIA's control library on EU AI Act articles, NIST AI RMF subcategories and ISO 42001 clauses, so a red team result becomes a governance record.
- Scheduled regression runs against your endpoint with drift alerts, and a one page guardrail efficacy score a CISO can read.
How it maps to the frameworks
| Obligation | Where | What the product does | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Test AI systems against adversarial input | ISO/IEC 42001 A.6.2.6, NIST AI RMF Measure 2 | Corpus, five variant matrix, LLM judge. | Built |
| Robustness and cybersecurity of high risk systems | EU AI Act Article 15 | Findings carry the article and the posture. | Built |
| Evidence of control effectiveness | ISO/IEC 42001 clause 9.1 | Per finding artefacts, cross walked to controls. | Built |
| Continuous monitoring | ISO/IEC 42001 clause 9.1, NIST Manage | Scheduled regression and drift alerts. | In build, October 2026 |
| Agentic and tool use safety | NIST AI RMF, CERT-In AI advisory | Agentic testing pack: tool use, exfiltration, injection through documents. | In build, November 2026 |
Honest limits
- Not every control can be red team tested; controls are classified red team, hybrid or configuration and process, and the report never claims coverage it did not test.
- The corpus is proprietary and is not shipped to customers; results are.
Deployment
Python and Streamlit with SQLite history and a local evidence store. Runs from your network against your endpoint, so prompts and responses never leave your estate.
Test one endpoint
Point SPRICO at a staging endpoint. The demo returns the efficacy score and the ten findings that matter.